TPO48
The reading claims that many frogs in the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment.and it has serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog population. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas mentioned in the reading passage dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, The author argues that frogs are being harmed by pesticides and they have to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane.it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs. Conversely, the lecturer finds it highly questionable due to the fact that from economically point it is unfair. Agriculture’s severe disadvantage so they lose more crops.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that fungus has spread around the world with deadly effect. Those treatments, if applied on a large scale, would protect sensitive frog population from infection. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that they have to use fungus for each frog and it doesn't prevent frog and they have to use it again and again to each new generation of frogs.
Finally, the reading asserts that natural habitats are threatened water and if key water habitats such as lakes were better protected from excessive water use and development, and frog species would recover. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that another important issue is global warming and it contributes much water so the frogs can live easily with the effect of global warming on the level water in our planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...have to use fungus for each frog and it doesnt prevent frog and they have to use it ag...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13970588235 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74041858685 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1884939352 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.090909091 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.609091949704 0.272083759551 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209592882479 0.0996497079465 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145807567361 0.0662205650399 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329177015629 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463437997131 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.