TPO 52
The reading passage makes the point that comparing to establish colonies of humans to live and work on Moon or other neighboring planet, sending people to an asteroid would be the best option. The professor, in contrast, holds a different view by stating that what the reading talks about are not practical.
First, even the reading passage suggests that low gravity on the asteroid would facilitate people to land, bring more equipment and take off, the professor argues in the lecture that low gravity would cause several health problems. For example, people would lose their muscle and their bone density would decrease as well. So, people would struggled from serious health problems if they live on an asteroid for quite a long time.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that people could mine valuable metals, which are profitable on asteroids, the professor contends that this is not the whole picture. People should also consider the cost for establishing colonies and transporting those valuable metals, which would probably be higher than value of the metals themselves. And the price of the metals should be considered as well. Since the amount of the metals would increase because of mining activity, the metals' price would not remain stable.
Finally, contrary to what is mentioned in the reading that asteroids are easy to reach because they get close to Earth periodically, the professor suggests that it would not be easy for people to return. This is because some asteroids get close to Earth one point would not stay near Earth permanently. In this case, getting back to Earth could be really challenge for humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'struggle'
Suggestion: struggle
...ould decrease as well. So, people would struggled from serious health problems if they li...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, moreover, really, so, well, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09963099631 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44660299303 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2649748917 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465786914127 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17360734785 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875831439613 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271742634603 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061009866108 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.