TPO 52- integrated
The article states that asteroid colonization can be good option and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that this is not a practical idea and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that the low gravity on asteroids makes landing and takeoff easier, so the spaceships do not need to carry as much fuel and can carry more equipments with them. The professor refutes this point by mentioning that although low gravity makes landing and takeoffs easier, it also presents some risks. He explains that in low gravity condition, the astronauts' muscle mass and bone density will decrease. He goes on to say that even astronauts who spend just a few months in spaceships orbiting the earth, face these health problems and this danger is much higher if astronauts have to stay longer in low gravity on an asteroid.
Secondly, the article posits that by mining valuable materials such as gold, which can be found easily on asteroids, their colonization is profitable. This idea is challenged by the professor by saying that this is not the whole picture. He states that the cost of separating and transporting these metals to earth could be so much high that it reduces the profit. He elaborates on this by mentioning that the selling price of these metals may not remain the same, because when metals become available in large quantities, the supply will increase and thus the market price will decrease.
Finally, the reading says that since asteroids are easy to reach, they are a good option for colonization. However, the professor opposes this posit by saying that though some of these asteroids may be easy to reach, they may not be easy to return from. He explains that some of these asteroids have unusual orbits and while they may come near earth, they won't stay close and may go much farther from earth. Hence, getting back from these asteroids will be a big challenge.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88787878788 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48127792247 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8393367736 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332309939815 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121631498317 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772256450161 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193368025146 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703622628458 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.