TPO36
Both the author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the main reason which led the Mary Rose to sink. While the reading part lists three reasons as the possible causes of this incident, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the article posits that the half closed gunport led the seawater inside and caused this accident. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this assumption. The professor states that this surmise could be valid if the gunport were fired. However, based on the study done on this warship, whole guns are loaded, and they were not fired before the ship sank. As a result, this claim cannot be responsible for this accident.
Next, the passage mentions to the weak relationship between the sailors and the captain of the ship, which the sailors disobeyed the captain's order in an emergency situation. On the contrast, the lecturer challenges the validity of this claim. The professor asserts that the English navy army was picked among the most professional and capable sailors since the Mary Rose had a crucial position in the England army. In this case, the feasibility of disobedience of the sailors is so rare, because they were the best in their fields.
Finally, meanwhile, the text based on the French officer's claim, assumes that the drowning happened for the sake of the immense damage caused by the French ships; the instructor, on the other hand, refutes this claim. Based on the professor's logic, the French officer claimed in this way to demonstrate its priority toward the English army. In fact, the declaration of wear caused by the French army just possesses the political aspect, which the French army is stronger and invulnerable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... hand, refutes this claim. Based on the professors logic, the French officer claimed in th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, while, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03973509934 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46533797289 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3043796527 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.