TPO40
The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that Venus is inhospitable for human presence and proposes an idea to solve each of the points mentioned in the reading.
The professor explains that instead of landing an aircraft on the planet's surface, some researchers proposed to float the station in the atmosphere. This approach would solve all the problems associated with landing on Venus.
First of all, the reading states that due to the very high surface pressure of the planet, everything made by humans will be crushed. The professor argues that a floating station could be sent to the altitudes in which the pressure equals the Earth pressure. This happens because the pressure lowers when the station goes high up.
Secondly, there are various compound chemical substances, including carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, in the atmosphere that can be used to obtain water and oxygen through the chemical processes. Thus, the lack of water and oxygen on Venus could not be an issue.
Finally, the professor asserts that high in the atmosphere, the clouds are thinner. Besides, due to the fact that the station is floated in the atmosphere, it can take advantage of the direct light of sunlight and the reflected light of the clouds below. Therefore, the thick clouds and the dense layer of carbon dioxide would not make a big problem for a floated station
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99565217391 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52506901588 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4183950048 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.454545455 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342665543146 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120296106869 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517729116019 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166491589469 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330248442872 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.