TPO50
The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that proposes three possible problems that man would face while trying to travel to Mars and refutes each of the points made in the reading.
First of all, the author states that a trip to Mars and back will take two years and the vessels do not have enough capacity to board all the food, water and oxygen required for two years. On the other hand, the professor argues against this view by pointing out that by the advent of hydroponics - a special type of planting that helps to grow plants in water rather than soil- these problems could easily be solved. Besides, the hydroponics system recycles the wastewater, and plants use carbon dioxide and produce oxygen, too. Hence, the first argument is not convincing.
Secondly, the professor's opinion contradicts the second point of the text that zero-gravity can cause a lot of damage to the muscle mass and bone density of the astronauts. She believes that astronauts have already launched on some space stations for several times. Thus, they found some useful techniques to maintain their health. For instance, they do regular exercise to save their muscle mass or take some vitamins and calcium to make up their bone density. Accordingly, the second explanation has some deficiencies regarding the main point of the passage.
Finally, the reading material asserts that solar radiation of the outer space is extremely harmful while there is no shield to protect astronauts. The professor opposes this idea by clarifying that space radiation is not dangerous all the time. Therefore, the spacecraft can be equipped with some devices that can monitor solar radiation and detect the dangerous rays. Furthermore, the vessels can have some shielded parts. So, in case of harmful radiation, the astronauts can use these shielded areas until the danger passes. Thus, the third reason does not hold due to the lack of compelling evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ment is not convincing. Secondly, the professors opinion contradicts the second point of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, while, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06853582555 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52866937749 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585669781931 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7378835453 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6875 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.