TPO41

Essay topics:

TPO41

The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that the power companies oppose the stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash and refutes each of the arguments made in the passage.
First of all, the reading states that there are already some regulations like using liner-special materials. The professor explains that the existed regulations are not sufficient. She argues that the liner regulation is only obligatory for new landfills and ponds. Thus, stricter rules should be created for all sites, old and new.
Secondly, according to the reading, stricter regulations would result in the lower tendency of customers for exploiting the recycled coal ash products. The professor rejects this idea by giving an example of mercury. This material has been under very strict rules for a long time due to its possible dangers, but it has been successfully recycled, and this process has not changed the customer's minds towards the products.
Finally, the professor confirms that the stricter rules would increase the costs for the power companies. However, she believes that the merits of this approach weigh out its drawbacks. In fact, the increased electricity costs have a small effect of up to 1 percent, but its huge environmental advantages are far more important.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, thus, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28640776699 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75572994084 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616504854369 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4092372667 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374578208957 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127988654574 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964165050654 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213007957163 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672334479601 0.0443174109184 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.