TPO42
In the reading passage, the author proposes that there are ways to prevent birds from being harmed by glass windows, which is case serious doubt on by the listening passage arguing that all of the methods don't make sense.
Firstly, as the author claims, one solution is to replace the regular glass by one-way glass which makes birds think that is a solid barrier and will not fly through it. On the contrary, the speaker views that the surface of one-way glass will reflect like a mirror which is harmful for birds. The glass will reflect sky and trees but birds know nothing about the mirror. They will think those reflections are real sky and trees, so they will fly into them. Thus, it is clear that one-way glass cannot help to stop hurting birds, which proves that the first point of view is not reasonable.
Secondly, the reading passage points out that painting colorful lines one the glass could make birds to see the stripes and will not fly onto windows. However, the lecturer argues that although people can see out from opening area, birds can also see the opening as holes and they will fly through the holes. Besides, if the unpainted areas are so small, it is too dark for people inside to see outside. Therefore, it is not a good method to prevent birds from flying through windows, which clashes with the viewpoint of writer.
Finally, the writer insists that building artificial magnetic field can steer bird flying away from building. However, the speaker contends with the reading passage again by arguing that birds only use their ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields when they fly long distance such as flying from a cold country to a warm one before winter. For short distance, like fly from one side of building to the other side, birds will just use their eyes and brightness of light to decide. Thus, it is useless to create electromagnets to guide birds to fly away, which challenges the last point of writer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...n by the listening passage arguing that all of the methods dont make sense. Firstly, as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...passage arguing that all of the methods dont make sense. Firstly, as the author c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71847507331 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13598873203 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8548161319 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494957847186 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182563251909 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782748816957 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284914326065 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838759953605 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.