TPO42
The professor revises the idea presented in the text about the three possible solutions for reducing injuries to birds caused by their crashes into glass windows and refutes each of the points made in the passage.
First of all, the reading proposes to use one-way glass instead of the regular glass. The professor rejects this idea. He states that one-way glass is like a mirror, and mirrors are as bad as the regular glass for birds because the birds cannot understand the mirror. They think the reflection of the sky or a tree is the object itself and might try to fly through the reflection. Thus, this approach will not work for the purpose intended in the passage.
Secondly, the professor's opinion contradicts the colorful design solution mentioned in the passage. He believes that the birds consider the open parts of the glass as open holes and fly right through them. To avoid this, the stripes should be very close, which in turn could make the room very dark for the residents. Therefore, using the colorful stripes on the windows does not seem like a good idea to help the birds get fewer injuries.
Finally, the professor confirms that the birds have a magnetic compass, too. However, he explains that the birds use this ability only when they travel over very long distances, for instance, in their migration periods. Thus, when the birds go over short periods, they simply take advantage of their eyes and the brightness of the light. So, using an artificial magnetic field, as the reading passage suggested, would not have a great effect on preventing birds’ injuries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ntended in the passage. Secondly, the professors opinion contradicts the colorful design...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89298892989 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38280400632 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568265682657 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8109129063 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466359647924 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139846826124 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730207055347 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258610774943 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673420606866 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.