TPO46
The reading and the listening passage have conflicting opinions about whether it is good to use electronic medical record systems or not. The author believes that using electronic databases has several advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and bring up three reasons to reject it. she thinks using this approach is very uncertain.
The first point the author makes that is electronic records can help reduce costs. It is mentioned by this there is no need to use paper for copying, faxing, transporting and also saving therefore, it costs much less than using traditional method. However, the lecturer opposes this point by explaining that most doctor will not throw out the paper record and will still keep it as backup. It is mentioned that by using electronic record there still be storage cost.
Secondly, the author contends that, electronic records can reduce of medical errors because they are associated with standardization of forms and legible fonts. The lecturer rebuts this argument. she notes that most doctors still use pen and take notes by hand. she says that their staff will create an electronic records later from the notes consequently, there will still be mistakes.
Finally, The author states that large amounts of data which is gathered by electronic medical records can help medical research. The article established that database can provide easy way for search. The concept is refused by the lecturer which asserts that there are some law which restrict access and use database. she put forwards the idea that medical records are private and some patients block using their record for many people.
In conclusion, the lecturer and the author appear to be in disagreement about whether using electronic medical records are beneficial. the author contends that they are three benefits for it which is contradicted by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ronic databases has several advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...using this approach is very uncertain. The first point the author makes that is el...
^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso saving therefore, it costs much less than using traditional method. However, ...
^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...nts. The lecturer rebuts this argument. she notes that most doctors still use pen a...
^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...s still use pen and take notes by hand. she says that their staff will create an el...
^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...which restrict access and use database. she put forwards the idea that medical reco...
^^^
Line 6, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ctronic medical records are beneficial. the author contends that they are three ben...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16938110749 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53975175866 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7919157116 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1666666667 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486230014401 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154863338676 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124729455877 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277117582421 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720348560073 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.