TPO46 integrated
The author of the reading passage recommends that doctors should store patients' medical records in electronic databases because it has several advantages, while the lecturer in the lecture expresses an opposite view.
To begin with, the author claims that using electronic records can reduce costs on storage and transportation of medical records. However, the lecturer refutes that this method is not as economical as the passage suggests. Even if doctors adopt electronic databases to store those record, they still need the original hand-written scripts with signatures as backups, because of their legal effects. This is the reason why most doctors, including those who already computerized patients' records in electronic form, are still keeping the paper records.
Moreover, the author believes that electronic medical records can help to lower the chances of medical errors. On the contrary, the lecturer rebuts that it cannot eliminate the possibility of such errors caused by illegible handwriting, because doctors need to take notes and write prescriptions when examine a patient, then by other staff are those records entered into databases. Therefore, owing to the lack of professional medical knowledge, those staff would have troubles in interpreting the information, which leads to inevitable medical errors.
Finally, the author puts forward that medical research benefits from large amounts of data in electronic medical records. Instead, the lecturer retorts that digital records cannot make it easier to access and use data, because such usages are subjected to strict privacy laws - patients have the right to keep their records private if they wish. To obtain the information, a researcher must follow many complicated procedures, including requiring the permission from patients themselves, which is difficult because they can rightfully block the use of records for any purpose.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63103448276 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76550541801 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7466227714 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552254012283 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218980928436 0.0996497079465 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10271300689 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341130854028 0.162205337803 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481239898338 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.3589403974 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.8541721854 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.