TPO47
In this set of material, the article explains three main hypothesises to reject that ptrosaurs did not have powered wings to fly, while the lecture casts doubts on the information presented in the reading section and believes that these presented theories are not conviencing enough.
First off all, the reading passage makes the point that the pterosaurs were cold-blooded, so they could not have enough energy. In contrast, the condustor gives the impression that evidence of fossile record reveals pterosaurs are warm-blooded, thereby had enough energy to power fly. She cites the information involving evideince of dense cover of fur which proves that they were warm- blooded animals.
Second, the professor disagrees with the idea that the pterosurs were huge animals because their larg weight avoid them to fly, and implies that pterosaurs unlike their size had light weigh. Then, she highlights how they could be able to fly easily. She elaborated by saying that their body were full of holes instead of being solid. In fact, she believs that they had light weight rather than their size.
Finally, although the reading assers that they had not powerful rare legs whereas, other birds have the powerful rare leg to fly and jump, the speaker argues that pterosaurs took advantage of four legs to fly not only for flying, but also for running and walking. She makes it clrear and gives examples to illustrate this feature and describes how they walked or jummed. So, she elaborates that because pterosaurs pushed all of their four legs, there was enough energy to run fast and jump higher heigh.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this set of material, the article exp...
^^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in hypothesises to reject that ptrosaurs did not have powered wings to fly, while...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...theories are not conviencing enough. First off all, the reading passage makes...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat they were warm- blooded animals. Second, the professor disagrees with the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ight avoid them to fly, and implies that pterosaurs unlike their size had light w...
^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...lid. In fact, she believs that they had light weight rather than their size. Finally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...light weight rather than their size. Finally, although the reading assers tha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to fly and jump, the speaker argues that pterosaurs took advantage of four legs t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07547169811 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38371716266 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9344942841 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366786741612 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128845643065 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786117114185 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201462227124 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743828213643 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.