TPO49 Integrated Writing
The reading claims that humpback whales migrate long distances by navigating from the stars. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons. Nevertheless, as the professor believes it is fascinating idea but thinks evidence are not convincing and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading asserts that they are intelligent animals with far exceeds brain power and indicates their cognitive ability as considerable reason. However, the professor refutes this concept by stating that navigation by stars not connected to intelligent of animals. In addition, he states ducks as another animals navigation by stars without any high intelligent overall or cognitive ability.
Furthermore, the article posits that humpback whales migerate in stright lines as some birds which used from landmark to stay on direct track. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the fact that another external forces as correct defination. he states that humpback whales have bio magnit ability whch help them to sense earth's magnitic field in order to migerating long distance with straight lines.
Finally, the article avers that humpback whales have unusal behavior ( floating stright up for several minutes) which could be imply they are looking for stars to navigation. Contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim by stating that some sharks which don't migerate but act as the whales. In fact sharks use spy-hopping in order to looking for hunting. Also, he mentioned that whales do spy-hopping in day time more than night; hence, there is not stars on night sky and this cocept has poor definition, too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...In addition, he states ducks as another animals navigation by stars without any high in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... external forces as correct defination. he states that humpback whales have bio ma...
^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat humpback whales have unusal behavior floating stright up for several minutes ...
^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... floating stright up for several minutes which could be imply they are looking fo...
^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...claim by stating that some sharks which dont migerate but act as the whales. In fact...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32558139535 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59337085305 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0430954035 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429101593856 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12956533133 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967547389875 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219685142826 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711088073512 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.