Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Job occupie one of the most important portion of our life. Every individual dedicate at least 40 persent of his/her life to job. So it is really important choosing a suatiable job.For two reasons I agree that it is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' job.
First of all, their parents gathered a huge amount of experiece could quide them and in every instance of their job they can feedback them. I have a friend he is studying maths. He is amoung the top students in his class. Once I asked him about his success and said to me because my father is a mathematision too I can be in the top. He said that in every step his father quide him to be as good as possible.
Secondly, it is easy for childre to improve if they choose their parents job. In fact parents job has a direct effect on their children thinking. Usually politations child know alot of things about politacs and donctors about medician. I have a friend he knows alot about philosophy only because his father graduated from philosophy, I am sure that if he choose philosophy as a carier he can promot in that fild.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is better for children to choose their parents job. This is because they can use for their parents experience and they can reache to high levels in their field.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ally important choosing a suatiable job.For two reasons I agree that it is better f...
^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e my father is a mathematision too I can be in the top. He said that in every ste...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sible. Secondly, it is easy for childre to improve if they choose their parents ...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed from philosophy, I am sure that if he choose philosophy as a carier he can pro...
^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
... from philosophy, I am sure that if he choose philosophy as a carier he can promot in...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, secondly, so, at least, in conclusion, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1977.66487455 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 242.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45454545455 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44890411072 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 618.680645161 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3811559406 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399324748256 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158903863414 0.076458572812 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179114554339 0.0737576698707 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278536936399 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13361356674 0.0645574589148 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.