Tpo54
In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that salinity of The Salton Sea is upbringing forthcoming problems which result in the destruction of the bird and fish population and endorse its idea by presenting three resolution. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that the solution provided in the reading are unpractical and dubious, and gainsays each argument in the reading.
First and foremost, the writer begins by asserting that the removal of saltwater from the lake by desalination would be helpful. The speaker on the listening refutes this comment by insisting that the desalination process though reduce salinity, but it will result in serious other problems. To be more specific, as a result of desalination, certain salt and toxic chemicals are deposited and left behind. He exemplifies that by selenium. He explains that the remaining debris of Selenium could result in serious health problems when it will be dispersed by wind.
Furthermore, the lecturer points out that for dilution solution government needs to construct canals or pipelines, and the government has not enough resources to build that pipeline. In other words, the nearest shoreline for this process is 100km away. Therefore, it could be a financial burden on the government. These claims clearly refute the writer's implication that dilution of the Salton sea with lake water by building pipelines or canals solve the issue.
Lastly, the writer wraps up the arguments by declaring that partitioning the lake into separate sections( high and low salinity)would reduce the salinity. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes an issue with that by contending that the lake is geographically located in such an area where geological activities take place. He exemplifies this by the earthquake; that when it will happen, the barrier inside the sections of the lake will break, and water will be uniform again. Because high salinity water will be added to low salinity water, and hence this solution will not work too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that sali...
^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...rnment. These claims clearly refute the writers implication that dilution of the Salton...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23913043478 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83793333107 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2975148491 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.466666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363070283505 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102758625739 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878042559005 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182954095585 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104238913719 0.0443174109184 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.