Ways to eliminating the destructive effect of the glass architectures for the flying birds.
Both the passage and the talk dicuss the ways to reduce the harm of glass structures to birds. The composer contends that there are three ways to eliminate the injuries to the birds which are result of crash by transparent buildings. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessments. He demonstrates a reason for every solution, which is suggested by the author, to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is that the on-way glasses can be used, because birds can not see the inside of the glass, thereby avoid of hitting them. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that these kind of glasses act like mirror and could be as harmful as regualr glasses for the birds. For instance, when the image of sky or trees is reflected in the mirror flying birds can not distinguish between those images and the reallity, so they would have accident with glasses.
Second, according to the text, colorful designs can help the birds to recognize the obstacle in their way. The speaker, however, finds this idea debatable. He bolsters his opinion by statying that, the opinings which are between the thin painted stripes can be again the source of confusion for the birds, so much so that birds try to cross through those holes and they would be harmed again. Furthermore, if we try to reduce the size of the holes to avoid this, the inside of the building would be dark.
Lastly, the lecture contradicts this fallacy of the passage that creating magnetic fields can be useful, stating that birds use this kind of navigation in the long distances. For example, when they travel far away from a dry climate to a cold place they use the magnetic field of the earth, but in the short distances birds usually use their eyes to find the places they go.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... the professor highlights the fact that these kind of glasses act like mirror and could be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.715625 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37195322664 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2039759235 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185157695291 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654092535677 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636075127256 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115811966526 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768807297098 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.