The passage discusses about the adverse effects of aquamarine agriculture and using ocean floors for resources by citing some consequences which will be faced by exploiting the oceans for resources. However, the lecturer rebuts the claim and feels that there will be minimal impact on environment.
To begin with, the author in the passage states that, to search for the resources in oceans there will be tearing apart of oceans as there is no adequate information or evidence about where exactly the resources can be found. This will impact adversely on sea life. To oppose this point, the lecturer explains the process of how the resources are going to be discovered without affecting wide area of the oceans. Lecturer explains that to find the sources, they don't need to destroy the wide area and only small part of the ocean will be detected where the rich concentration of resources are found.
Furthermore, the passage states that lots of sand and dust will pollute the water. Also, poisonous gas and waste product will affect the sea water and sea currents will carry these harmful substances over the world. It can affect animals up-to 1000m depth. To oppose this point, lecturer tells that, disruption will take place only in small amount and that too near deserts. Als, he says that the plants like phytoplankton which are at the bottom of food pyramid will be affected mostly. So, this will not possess a major problem. He also says that the circulation will be only within few 1000 miles and that won't be perilous for aquatic life and plants as well.
Finally, the author claims in the passage that there will be destruction with when aquamarine agriculture is carried out. This he supports by the example of fishes like tuna and salmon by stating that they will be restricted to a small place to grow and fed. Doing so will cause their waste material in small area where they are present. This will affect the surrounding as well. However, author claims that, even if there is some harm to aquatic life, aquamarine agriculture is the need of an hour. Appetites are increasing, world population is outpacing the supply of traditional agriculture. So, it is necessary to use oceans for producing enough food. This won’t affect fish and marine life too as is going to near desert area where there are less umber of fishes.
So, to sum up the points in lecture and passage, lecture states that aquamarine agriculture is curse for the society stating various reasons like adverse impact on sea life, aquatic life in danger, poisonous gases in water bodies and etc. However, the lecturer feels the opposite, he explains the need of an aquamarine agriculture and gives example to support that it is not as dangerous as it is given in passage and moreover all the circumstances can be mitigated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a part of' or 'apart from'?
Suggestion: a part of; apart from
...sources in oceans there will be tearing apart of oceans as there is no adequate informat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...explains that to find the sources, they dont need to destroy the wide area and only ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 231, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...danger, poisonous gases in water bodies and etc. However, the lecturer feels the opposit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ves example to support that it is not as dangerous as it is given in passage and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 10.4613686534 268% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 5.04856512141 436% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 30.3222958057 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1373.03311258 170% => OK
No of words: 479.0 270.72406181 177% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88100208768 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.04702891845 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51312080271 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 145.348785872 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459290187891 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 733.5 419.366225166 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5645191962 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.652173913 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8260869565 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171270903589 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583750879674 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530925174638 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120766818243 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513866907177 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.