were dinosaurs feathered?
The reading and the lecture are both about the credence of the hypothesis regarding Sinasauropteryx. Three theories are provided in the passage in order to refute the interpretations of the evidence acquired through fossils which argue that this type of dinosaur was feathered. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of the theories presented in the passage. The lecturer is of the opinion that these dinosaurs, definitely, had feathers based on the following debated.
First of all, the author argues that the lines defining as remains of the feather can be created after the animals were dismissed. Accordingly, the passage mentions that the skin has decomposed into fibers, and the fibers have been preserved in the volcano ash, where the bodies has been buried. This specific argument has been challenged by the lecturer. According to the professor, since other bodies corps’ skins in the same site were totally preserved, these lines are not formed from fibers created by skin decomposition. Therefore, the lecturer firmly clings to this claim that the lines are caused by feather.
Secondly, the writer disputes these lines can give rise to the hypothesis that they are shaped from frills’ remains which is fan-shape structure out of the animals’ body. The lecturer, on the contrary, opposed this notion by providing the chemical analysis evidences. Furthermore, he elaborates on this by bringing the point that feather has a chemical substance thoroughly distinct from frills, which gives credence to the note that they cannot be mistaken.
Finally, the writer points to the ordinary function of the feather to averts that the remains are not from feather, given that animals apply their feather for thermoregulation or flying purposes; however, they have been assumed needless of both these objections. In contrast, the professor put forward to the point that beside these purposes, animals utilize feather to attract their mate which is known as display function. Hence, since these animals structure indicates colorfulness, it can be implied that they apply display function, and hardly we can assert that the remains were not created from feather.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 617, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m that the lines are caused by feather. Secondly, the writer disputes these line...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29261363636 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73156474537 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519886363636 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9399639567 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233053053631 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679036930836 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651880321931 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122231636535 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059973442228 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.