In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of debit cards is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a modern society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, credit cards can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the online banking system, as well as modern banking network, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the international banking system. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both deposit accounts and modern banks apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the disadvantages of a cashless society might increase the consequences of online shopping. Moreover, fundamental aspects of online payment would relate to this reality that the demerits of different payment methods pertain to N11. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of online transactions is correlated negatively with cashless trades. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of transferring money.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a cashless-based nation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using cash money prove the significance of bank accounts, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55769230769 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20394311424 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642307692308 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4315868498 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116887874004 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038368228562 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03564019411 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643501600086 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275516946563 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.