In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
There is a radical change in each and every field due to rapid advancement in technology. In cashless society people should opt transactions through online mode or offline mode has created a chaos in the country. Some people believe that it’s effectual for the society while some are opposing it. In this essay, I am going to deliver both sides before jumping to the conclusion.
There are myriad benefits of performing cashless transactions. To begin with the positive side, we can pay our sundry bills, purchase and subscribe to various services in minimal time as a result, there is a massive saving at the time. Moreover, due to the increase in the online mode, job openings also increases in the respective field simultaneously. For example, as per the recent survey by the technology experts, there is a substantial hike in the customer support Field due to increasing usage of technological services.
Nonetheless, there are also ramifications co-exist with the above bright sides. Firstly, users of the technology are always under the fear of spams and hacking. Secondly, in the many of the instance, people are unaware of the hidden charges deducted through online mode.
To sum up, the aforementioned points, I strongly believe that, undoubtedly, enhancing technological development is good for today’s life but one must be enough watchful while practicing it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntioned points, I strongly believe that, undoubtedly, enhancing technological dev...
^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be enough watchful while practicing it.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26126126126 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00185263251 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644144144144 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8119965507 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.25397266985 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0620124312162 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0238083015188 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297005791592 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0339121040146 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334829024828 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.