Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers?
Nowadays, shops are packed with overly packaged items. It has created a widespread worry and thus stirred a debate across the world. Many people think over packed items live a longer life, whereas opponents believe that these products are not environmental friendly. In my opinion, it is a responsibility of producers and consumer to restrict the use of over-packaged items. This essay will divulge both sides of arguments and thus conclude the statement.
To commence with, multiple layers are essential for improving the lifespan of products, but they also are costly and have a negative impact on the environment. Not only they increase the level of pollution, but also take many years to decompose. For example, use of the plastic is predominant in industries which are used for increasing the life of products and it takes ages to decompose.
In addition to that, overly packed products are costly and impact consumer's budget. Many producers use multiple layers to increase the cost of the products which is beneficial for their business. For example, many milk products come in six layers of packaging which are out the reach for common public. Furthermore, it is our duty to shun those products for the betterment of society.
As per the aforementioned statements, one can conclude that excessively packaged items are not beneficial for the environment. Therefore, consumers and producers should take the responsibility together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience. 77
- University students can learn academics through various sources like online teacher library etc What do you think which of them are reliable 49
- Successful sports starts and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- TELEVISION SHOWS AND ITS IMPACT ON SOCIETY 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29565217391 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95423184979 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0534342345 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252826751902 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974195747971 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101573849176 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161903451989 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862590543119 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.