Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products , or is it the responsibility of producers?
Over past few years, food industry has grown and evolved a lot. Thesesdays, food comes in variety of attractive packaging. Some believe that it is the responsibility of consumer to check and buy products, however others believe that producer should be held responsible for quality and packaging of food. In this essay we will discuss both points before reaching to conclusion.
First and foremost, people nowadays are very busy, sometimes every member from family is working, therefore its hard to cook food. In such case they prefer to buy food from market, as it is convenient and saves time. For instance, some one who is working till late night can't cook after reaching home, so for them packaged food is a good alternate.
On the flip side, over packaging increases the product price by many folds, as the manufacturer has to support his cost in preparing and packing food. For example, a burger from local market may cost less than the one you buy from a supermarket due to fancy and layered packing, although the content would be same. Moreover, sometimes we end up buying things due to attractive shiny packing, which we actually do not require.
In nut shell, as we know every coin has two sides, so as in this situation as well. Even with benefits of packaged food, over packing can not be ignored. Overall this is everyone's responsibility to check and make sure they are buying the things that they need, and also the producer should be mindful and honest about his work, and make sure that he mention everything on the label of food product.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...onvenient and saves time. For instance, some one who is working till late night cant coo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...some one who is working till late night cant cook after reaching home, so for them p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77407407407 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51319972137 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0607556202 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1538461538 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188344034505 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573891632744 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690950220625 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110741941013 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580006992671 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.