Do you think that place where the person grew up has an influence on his accomplishments? Explain with examples.
Nowadays, there is an ongoing deliberation people has influence on their accomplishments from where they grew up, which attracted myriads of controversies and drawn the attention from the public. it can be agreed that person learn foundation comes from grew up age which shapes person's career and future, but on the other hand some people holds contrary prospective. this essay will discuss both sides and thus lead to logical conclusion with my view point.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons how person's life depends on grew up life stages and opportunities, and the most conspicuous is that person's life and behaviour completely derive from its surrounding which is mostly based on their location. To cite an example, MS Dhoni Indian former cricket team captain was motivated from available opportunities to choose cricket as career, because cricket ground was in front of his house as well as school's main game was cricket which enable him to choose cricket and he achieved many accomplishments in that field. Therefore, person's accomplishments and future is completely based on its grew up location and surrounding situations.
On the other hand, some people holds opposing view and trend, and believed financial conditions and family backgrounds major role to play. To consider this, their prospective is also true for some extend, but to over counter their argument, I would like to assert that financial status can't derive person's energy and passion for anything, its always based on their situations and available resources which is based on their grew up locations. Hence, person's dreams and passion form from resources and opportunity which drive them towards their accomplishments.
Agglomerating all points above, as per my prospective it can be concluded that person's grew up has a major role to play in his/her accomplishments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nd drawn the attention from the public. it can be agreed that person learn foundat...
^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...some people holds contrary prospective. this essay will discuss both sides and thus ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ities, and the most conspicuous is that persons life and behaviour completely derive fr...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 198, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...their prospective is also true for some extend, but to over counter their argument, I ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 287, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ld like to assert that financial status cant derive persons energy and passion for a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35254237288 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94175186761 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0040665564 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.9 104.977214359 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210959033733 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898737898316 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617950418969 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134640823804 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539168587398 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.