How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?
Recently, the phenomenon of people who are spending too much time on conducting more work than their personal life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that sedentary lifestyle is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that decreasing social interaction can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, spending a great deal of time on our work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of lack of extensive experience, as well as feeling lonely, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered making a substantial money. Thus, beneficial ramifications of honing skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, n might increase consequences of having tension. Moreover, fundamental aspects of n would relate to this reality that being anxious demerits of being exhausted pertain to being boring. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that lack of knowledge is correlated negatively with decreasing people's communications. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of cyber addicted.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of conducting a substantial volume of work rather than spending too much time on our personal life outweigh its demerits. Not only do the advantages of private life would prove the significance of having better life, but also pinpoint high grades implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cting more work than their personal life and its corresponding impact has sparked...
^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'substantial money'.
Suggestion: substantial money
...ademic research which discovered making a substantial money. Thus, beneficial ramifications of honi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted that lack of knowledge is correlated negatively with decreasing peoples commu...
^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orrect to presume preconceived notion of cyber addicted. To conclude, while ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47445255474 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15527782371 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64598540146 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7409936783 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196009850809 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591207315647 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930568379945 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116932643124 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853239311007 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.