The illiterates of the 21 st century are not those who can not read and write, but those who cannot learn - Alvin Toffler. explain the statement and do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of the illiterature and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that Alvin Toffler idea highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that writing can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From reading standpoint, traditional education system can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that new learning method, as well as computer literacy skills, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered hard working. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both lack of role model and the burden of reading can be seen.
Within the realm of being deprived from school, school curriculum might increase the consequences of career perspective. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being diligent relate to this reality that the demerits of miserably failing to pertain to unable to reading. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of being illiterate is correlated negatively with 80 percent having the social problem. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being isolated from society.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of literacy skill far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of communication skills prove the significance of being intelligent, but also pinpoints of broaden your horizon implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61240310078 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1669489309 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682170542636 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9104713572 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0768225101788 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241514148508 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269555997425 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042466092115 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276153748914 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.