With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people are writing letters. Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree? How important do you think is letter-writing?
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing the usage of mobile phones and computers and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of the letter writing is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the traditional skills of letter writing can be a plus, and I will analyze throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, computer software can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of mobile games, as well as mobile applications, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed academic research which discovered the importance of written letters. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the computer and mobile management apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, skills of traditional writing might increase the consequences of writing skills. Moreover, fundamental aspects of computer technologies relate to this reality that the demerits of using social media on mobile phones pertain to mobile technologies. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of spending time on mobile phones could relate negatively to computer programs. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mobile apps.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of writing letters far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using mobile and computer software prove the significance of computers, but also pinpoint mobile phones implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58088235294 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13872418872 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.03826128 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228389311241 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804404421415 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512311053007 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136431589245 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351531233694 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.