Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development?
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing the large shopping mall with small local shops in cities or towns and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, this issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that development of large shopping mall can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, influence of developing large shopping malls in towns and cities can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as, ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, the replacement of small local shops with large shopping malls in large cities or small towns might increase the consequences of critical need. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of developing the small shops and replacing them with large shopping mall far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64259927798 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.132975038 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.7091611519 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.090909091 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38738185672 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139651008113 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157064737998 0.071462118173 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242942972349 0.151781067708 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795743841023 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.