The mass media, including TV, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

Essay topics:

The mass media, including TV, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

The only ways which people acquire information about the world are through social media, TV, radio and/or newspaper. Even though some people believe that they are not affected by those media, others think that they do play an intrinsic role. In my opinion, I tend to agree with whose people who believe that they are influenced by media.
First of all, what it is shown on TV is a true fact. It makes individuals behave accordingly. For example, in 2005 the tornado Catrina razed some location in the south of Brazil and people living nearby were advised by U.S. authorities to leave the area. Unfortunately, some died and others suffered some injuries. Therefore, people needed to believe that what was impending would certainly devastate the area.
Moreover, when it is the election time, everyone leans on the candidates' promises. They are influenced by candidates' speech so that they vote for such candidate. They lay upon their beliefs that what their candidates are proposing is true. For example, according to the New York Times the last election year in the U.S. people were persuaded by Facebook to vote for Donald Trump to win the election and this was alike in Brazil last year. Thus, when someone reads newspapers or any social media,, they tend to become persuasive.
Finally, people are easily persuaded by media because they do not look forward to seeing what can be true or can be false. They sometimes lack in knowledge to be capable to identify the truthiness and falseness of the facts.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...idates promises. They are influenced by candidates speech so that they vote for such candi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...one reads newspapers or any social media,, they tend to become persuasive. Finall...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90234375 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49589201063 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6689635189 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6666666667 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172170621187 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551548355494 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463005291702 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102378504084 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434793155905 0.0609392437508 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.