“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, the avaibility of information by using Internet has made this assumption that libraries are useless among the inhabitants all around the world. Although the Internet capabilities and all the facilities which are generated by it is beneficial as it regarded by a substantial numbers of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents view about declining the role of libraries. I am inclined to believe that these places are quite significant as they could develop some brilliant aspects for their adherents.
From a social standpoint, libraries have not become redundant because they are much more than mere access points for books and information. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the aspects of existing libraries in societies. This research showed due to the distractions of everyday life and our sedantery lifestyles which can kill the joy of studing, libraries can provide a quite environment for reading and concentrating on particular topics and adrress this difficulty. Furthermore, libraries have specific space that motivate everyone to read and study.
On the one hand, there is no doubt Internet provide an array of accessibilities which alter the process of searching more easier than past. Internet have this potential to provide easy availibility of information. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university has asserted that the amount of time which is allocated for finding an especial subject by reading books, magazines and articles has diminish to half by searching online.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of existing libraries and using them beside Internet for searching and accessing the information far more outweigh from not considering them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('environment') instead of another adjective.
...e joy of studing, libraries can provide a quite environment for reading and concentrating on partic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...he one hand, there is no doubt Internet provide an array of accessibilities which alter...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...es which alter the process of searching more easier than past. Internet have this potential...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...arching more easier than past. Internet have this potential to provide easy availibi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...arching more easier than past. Internet have this potential to provide easy availibi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'diminished'.
Suggestion: diminished
...ading books, magazines and articles has diminish to half by searching online. To conc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59450171821 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12616955358 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6706902141 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0788328396042 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333338001022 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325916385761 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470471594608 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191034864974 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.