People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people faceto-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
Recently, the phenomenon of performing everyday task and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that shopping and banking is highly beneficial such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that business transactions is highly beneficial, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From technicians standpoint, high technology can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that individuals, as well as society, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered shopping list. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both shop center and bank loans apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of information technology, bank accounts might increase the consequences of bank notes. Moreover, fundamental aspects of financial transactions relate to this reality that the demerits of people faceto-face pertain to new technologies. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of bank bills is correlated negatively with social problems. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of medical technologies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of shopping and banking systems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of some business transactions prove the significance of people welfare, but also pinpoint society implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
- Do you think the school should have a curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago? 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 88
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81967213115 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30991279477 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7778640441 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24582428703 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718721379078 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378254791942 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126254976661 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00822098776238 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.