Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one career. To what extent do you agree ?
Recently, a phenomenon of self grooming has sparked an ongoing debate which inevitably leads to a moot question, what is required for professional development? Whereas some believe that grooming is the key to success however, many hold its opposite view. In this essay I will discuss the topic with related examples.
From the social standpoint, personal development of an individual has provided a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that confidence and good impression are inextricably bound up. according to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an experiment which discovered that about 80 percent of the jobs are hired according to self developed skills and great confidence level. Thus, beneficial ramification of this phenomenon can be seen.
within the realm of work, some adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that success and achievement cannot be gain until one mingle within the working environment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of work zone play a vital role to develop base for the professional knowledge. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by some prestigious university asserted that greatest amount of employees cannot survive in the job due to lack of professional skills. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of working environment help to groom an individual.
To conclude, there is several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal grooming far outweighs the other benefits. Not only encouraging one to take part in different media but also allowing to be proactive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...grooming is the key to success however, many hold its opposite view. In this essay I will...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ication of this phenomenon can be seen. within the realm of work, some adopt an ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...on of this phenomenon can be seen. within the realm of work, some adopt an opposi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvironment help to groom an individual. To conclude, there is several compelling...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34496124031 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05252429524 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658914728682 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7275850544 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173526593989 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556976278553 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687910419168 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919672294906 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255176064632 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.