Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them?
Human is a social animal and he can not live in isolation. People who have no one to live with, prefer to keep pets as they provide company to them. Some individuals do not take care of their pets due to various reasons. I think such people should not be allowed to keep pets. There will be an explanation on this statement in the following essay with adequate reasons and a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, many people keep pets to not to feel lonely while others do so as a hobby. Some of them are very good caretakers but some do not pay attention toward the cleanliness and feeding of the pets. Therefore many pets become ill and die due to various diseases.
Furthermore, in the today's busy life, people have no time for their families, so, how they can give time to the pets. Due to laziness and less time, people avoid to take care of the animals. They just use them for entertainment and to satisfy their hobbies.
Such people should not be allowed to keep pets because animals are also living beings. They need care and proper nutrition as the human being needs.
In conclusion, pets also need proper care and attention. People who can not take care of their pets must not be permitted to keep them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | shyamsingh08 | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | daniellima126 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | Kushi | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | Agustinaac | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Sekhonsaab221@gmail.com | 70 | view |
- Around the world, solar energy is becoming a more popular source of energy for many households. Why do you think this is so? What are the advantages and disadvantages of using solar energy to power one’s home? 55
- In the past 100 years, path breaking inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes, and computers have changed the very concept of living. What do you think has been the most important invention for the past 100 years? Why? 77
- Experts feel that the design of buildings sometimes has a positive effect on people s life and work Discuss 44
- Mistakes obviously show us what needs improvement Without mistakes how would we know what we had to work on Are mistakes the portals of discovery or progress State your opinion and support it with reasons and or examples from your own experience or observ 56
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management e 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...he cleanliness and feeding of the pets. Therefore many pets become ill and die due to var...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid taking'.
Suggestion: avoid taking
.... Due to laziness and less time, people avoid to take care of the animals. They just use them...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 1207.87684729 83% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53603603604 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35499441643 2.71678728327 87% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 379.143842365 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6882968954 50.4703680194 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.1333333333 104.977214359 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46192287515 0.242375264174 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160590440032 0.0925447433944 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980586839621 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277271385124 0.151781067708 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842885694166 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 12.6369458128 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.1260098522 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.9458128079 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.46 11.5310837438 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.32886699507 86% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.5123152709 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.