Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently the phenomenon of placing advertisements in public school has sparked a heated debate. Some people assert that placing advertisements at school is a great resource which requires more funding, while others argue that it will lose interest in studies. This essay will argue despite significant downsides why placing advertisements at schools benefits children.
To begin with, there are plethora of disadvantages in placing advertisements at schools. Firstly, children will get distracted from their studies and will lose interest. Students will not be able to concentrate in their educational fields. Secondly, young juveniles will always think of doing extra activities or to take part in such programmes. For example, University of Columbia reveals that around 80% of students are more interested in placing advertisements at schools not in education. Hence, there are many negative sides for advertisements at school.
On the other hand, there are myriad of benefits from such activities. Children will be more independent and will gain more courage to come up with certain skills. Furthermore, they can boost their performance skills and creativity skills. Moreover, students can gain knowledge about the advertisements. To cite an example, Harward school shows that students who are interested in activities are 85% more intelligent. Probing further, if the advertisements are about hand sanitizer they can get the information and use it in right way. Therefore, such programs are good for students at schools.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed about both the sides of placing advertisements at school. In my opinion, placing advertisements are good at school as they can students get more knowledge and skils, however, the darker side cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Keiwan | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | ajayaryanone | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | ahmedmemon_93 | 77 | view |
- internet will soon replace books .do you agree or disagree? 75
- more information has come up online, so library books no one is referring.agree or disagree? 60
- as cities are expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples 88
- In today’s world, different governments and international organisations are confronting many problems to deal with. What is the most pressing problem among them? How can it be taken care of? 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58671586716 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14203554381 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549815498155 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.372024571 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1111111111 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0555555556 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226238877903 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783623884227 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718171125065 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157017263837 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807794120748 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.