Some say that it would be better if majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday.
Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you choose that position.
Nowadays, the culture of distant working is booming rapidly because of the convenience it provides to both the employees and employers. Some individuals tend to think that this approach is much effective than travelling daily to a workplace. This essay will discuss the reasons why a distant working approach is both effective and non-effective with respect to the employees and employers both before concluding.
Undoubtedly, working from home approach offers an employee with numerous benefits. More specifically, it saves the travelling duration of the individuals to their offices. In turn, the employees can utilize that time period in accomplishing their assigned task instead of roving through the ways to their offices. Therefore, they can prove to be more effective in their work through this distant working approach.
Having said that, this alternative does have certain hidden pitfalls as well. Working from residence may not provide proper professional working environment to the employees as well as certain distractions may arise in between the task. For instance , disturbance from children or neighbors may cause turbulence in their official work and employees may find it difficult to concentrate on their assigned task. Thus, this can be proved as an unsuccessful approach for both the employees and employers as both will not be able to achieve their targets.
In conclusion, the essay has discussed how distant working offers an employee to save their travelling time while it also lead to deviation from their work. To my way of opinion, working from home is an effective approach than travelling daily to a workplace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that time period in accomplishing their assigned task instead of roving through ...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... arise in between the task. For instance , disturbance from children or neighbors ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39147286822 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91763163378 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8457034738 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199654012492 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851320731983 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390044350104 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13834909851 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156133856255 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.