Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on society due to high education in a powerful country. While it is possible to claim that the higher education in a powerful country takes more money, in my point of view there are lots of advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while discussing different viewpoints of the argument.
First and foremost, there are myriad of benefits a student can practically experience because of higher education in a powerful country, such as the quality of the education, more up to date courses, usability, and integrity. Even though there are lots of local institutions available in developing countries, students practically give their priority for education in another country. Australia, New Zealand and the United States are the most common examples of this. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that foreign education adds more values to live while improving the higher education accountability and responsibility.
On the other hand, those who believe the local university education as the best have a different point of view and say foreign education destroy the local culture, and the students should pay more. For instance, after completing the higher education, students should reach out to the mother country and their new behaviour and attitudes will destroy the society. Therefore, it is considered that the higher education is not a good thing for a pupil. But, in anyhow, there are courses that are not available locally and students should migrate for their higher studies.
In conclusion, it is considered that the education in a powerful country as a must for a student who studies a feather. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that each government should interfere for this hazard and find a cognitive solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
... higher education in a powerful country takes more money, in my point of view there a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24092409241 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91842868339 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508250825083 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2564500964 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.153846154 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13577577531 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552415569733 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591870501851 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917796568679 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606610934542 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.