There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phone. do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones?
In historical period there are no any technology available everyone only do face to face conversation. Moreover they send letters to their near once. When they have any happy memory or they have any sad memory they only sent letter because that time people do not have mobile phone and other mode of live communications. There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. I will discuss both agree and disagree in this statement.
Firstly, in this modern era people are very depended on their mobile phones they do not take care about their health and about their living life. It has lots of problem like social, medical and technical problem. Moreover like a mobile network tower is near to house is very dangerous for that people who are living their got medical issues and more than it. After that children are totally depended on mobile phone more time in-house they use it and they get their eyes weak and get bad effect. People are only depended on social media they do not know what is going on live.
On the other hand, technology is very good thing in people life. Because now day’s people are totally depend on it when they go to offices they do work on computers or on mobile phone. Moreover when person is not well and there is nobody at their home they can call and inform their near ones and get help. For example 30% of people save their life because of phone.
To conclude, I think that people should use phone in less time and aware from its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
In historical period there are no any technology available everyone only ...
^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...yone only do face to face conversation. Moreover they send letters to their near once. W...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...lth and about their living life. It has lots of problem like social, medical and technical prob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... social, medical and technical problem. Moreover like a mobile network tower is near to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...o work on computers or on mobile phone. Moreover when person is not well and there is no...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62361623616 5.00649968141 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22974735344 2.71678728327 82% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516605166052 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1312387201 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5333333333 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280734464206 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117743295392 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143602691202 0.071462118173 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173664560975 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754212977242 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.5310837438 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.32886699507 86% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 55.0591133005 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.