“Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
As many famous celebrities are adopting to go vegetarian the concept of vegetarianism is gathering steam. There is an increasing debate nowadays if being omnivore means being less ethical than a vegetarian person. This essay will show why eating habits of a person should not be linked with ethics.
In some parts of the world getting to eat vegetarian food is quite expensive whereas on the other hand meat is readily and is less cheaper. This is evident in Arctic as well as desert areas where lack of vegetation causes the country to import from other countries increasing their cost. Therefore, being vegetarian cannot be made compulsory everywhere.
Also now it is scientifically proven that meat contains more proteins than any of the vegetarian food at the same time we all are aware pain is not only limited to animals but plants do experience pain and have emotions while plucking fruits or even touching them. So, someone eating meat cannot be called less social than a vegetarian person in the view of the above.
Though vegetarianism is gathering steam it cannot be ruled out that a vast majority of people eat meat. This essay has highlighted the fact a person's food habits should not be linked to his ethics or behavior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As many famous celebrities are adopting to...
^^
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
As many famous celebrities are adopting to go vegetarian the conce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less cheap'?
Suggestion: less cheap
...n the other hand meat is readily and is less cheaper. This is evident in Arctic as well as d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... cannot be made compulsory everywhere. Also now it is scientifically proven that me...
^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tarian person in the view of the above. Though vegetarianism is gathering steam it can...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
.... This essay has highlighted the fact a persons food habits should not be linked to his...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1207.87684729 85% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8672985782 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64532255267 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63981042654 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2451911663 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167910878918 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702519576327 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289046361178 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105460497074 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226038487439 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.