What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved?
Recently, the phenomenon of people migrating to big cities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that there are several benefits of relocating to metropolitan areas, considering the numerous problems in villages, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. This essay will confer that there are several profits of living in big cities and highlight the problems of rural areas.
At the outset, these days we can observe that a substantial number of people are considering moving to urban places because of the plethora of facilities available. For instance, amenities such as the convenience of the public transport system, round the clock availability of water & electricity, and better education systems are attracting countless individuals towards big cities. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of living in metro cities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of problems living in rural areas, plenty of families counter myriad issues such as the absence of better hospitals, proper roads, and satisfactory accommodations. Another key justification for upholding this notion is a huge problem of unemployment in villages which compels young people to leave their hometown and relocate to towns. The solution to these complex problems starts from fulfilling the basic needs of people so that they can focus on improving their life. Governments need to take rigorous measures to ensure rural people have a stable monthly income and high-quality education.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that living in big cities has its own benefits but allocating good facilities to small cities simply cannot be ignored.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, if, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61678832117 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04522387186 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620437956204 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7064147408 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.909090909 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196734131418 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722452337907 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439591569413 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110107306631 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177710410569 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.