When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
The technological revolution affects all countries around the world in many ways significantly. Although technological development definitely makes everything convenient and faster, traditional skills still exists and have its own importance. In my opinion, it’s our responsibility to keep it alive and it’s not pointless. This essay will discuss both side of details.
To commence with, technology development in internet has widely enhanced the communications, productivity and eventually the economy of country. Communication is enhanced for both individuals and companies. As people can connect with their loved ones even though living in other side of world, companies can communicate more easily with foreign countries and can expand their business which boost up country’s economy. For instance, recently, Flipkart collaborated with Walmart and expanding its business. Therefore, technology opens door of new opportunities and allows us to showcase our traditional skills as well.
To continue with, although technology is developing sharply and enhancing the quality of products, products made using traditional skills have the high demand and prominent position in both national and international market. For example, in my town company called Jaipur Rugs, where rugs are weaved by weavers using traditional skills and on traditional looms are high in demand, exported and appreciated around the world. So, traditional skills still exist and making us proud at international platform with the help of technology.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that technology development is not hampering the traditional skills but increasing its popularity by combining with it. In my opinion, traditional skills will always hold the special place in our life and it’s our responsibility to keep it alive with technological development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'woven'.
Suggestion: woven
...pany called Jaipur Rugs, where rugs are weaved by weavers using traditional skills and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9010989011 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28082051099 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7135397189 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226844624844 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779641311656 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494886432749 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15095022418 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449422210391 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.