Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Much research done by researchers that how innovative designs of buildings are impacting our personal life and productivity at work. I am completely agreed with the statement that designs of building are playing a key role in every individual’s life over the centuries and it still does. This essay will discuss positive impacts of building design and infrastructure and provide a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, Innovative designs, architecture and well-maintained buildings are not only attracting many people but also boost up their mood and increase productivity of organization. These things encourage people to broaden up their horizon and think more creatively due to calm and clean environment which eventually contributes in country’s economic growth. For instance, Infosys has the most innovative infrastructures across India and several times nominated as the best Indian IT companies because of high revenue and profit. Therefore, there is strong correlation between architecture of building and employee’s productivity.
To continue with, Infrastructure plays vital role in one’s health and life. Spacious buildings with ample ventilation effect health of individual because these facilities allow enough air and sun lighting in the house which help to reduce individual’s stress level. As stress is root cause of many disease nowadays, it also suggested by doctors to have enough sun exposure to prevent depression. For example, our place is having ample ventilation and sun light exposure it really feels so lively and vanishes my stress after hectic working hours or during weekend. So, design of buildings or houses surely has impact on people’s health.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that innovative infrastructure, designs, colours and ventilation these factors are widely affecting our health, personal life and productivity at work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 8.36945812808 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82685512367 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30273217287 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643109540636 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0011270629 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329688215036 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118508174665 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911774466132 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183353549968 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112390009799 0.0609392437508 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.