Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
The statement asserts that educational institutes should encourage their students to study in fields will prepare them for lucrative careers. While there are careers that are more economically beneficial to others but there are many other factors that make a career lucrative. In my opinion the it is a good idea but hard to implement may not turn out be viable.
Education is becoming costly. Many students take loans to study. It is valid to expect reward from the career they choose. Institutions can help them in this regard. Institution are in best place to place know the most lucrative careers. If the students opt for such career then it is beneficial for them as well as it add up to the progress of the nation.
However, in that case certain fields will be thronged by students, and certain careers will face a dearth of them. This can create imbalance in diversity of careers. A nation will lack experts of certain field. One more problem is that even though a career is lucrative it may not fit a student's abilities and that students may fail in that career.
Other problem is that the defination of lucrative is subjective.What is a lucrative career? Many definations can be given, for some the one which gives more money, for some it is one which is safe, for some which adventures. In this case how an institution can give advise or encourage a student to take a career? The institution have to carefully analyze a student's interests. But then the student may not have the capability to pursue it. In short, even if institution are allowed to encourage students to pursue a particular career then question of for which career they should encourage?
The other problem with the idea is that institutions can not always be trusted to give the right advise to students. For example, they encourage to opt for fields that are more beneficial to them and not to students such those having high fees or low enrollment. Government institutions can be influenced by government to advise students to go in fields more beneficial to their agenda or prohibit them to take certain fields .
Concluding, encouraging students to pursue lucrative fields seems beneficial for students but there flaws and practical implementation related problems. Such a scheme can imbalance the society or harm the diversity of careers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
... make a career lucrative. In my opinion the it is a good idea but hard to implement ma...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...lp them in this regard. Institution are in best place to place know the most lucrative ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
...e defination of lucrative is subjective.What is a lucrative career? Many definations...
^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advice' (a noun)?
Suggestion: advice
...n this case how an institution can give advise or encourage a student to take a career...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'opting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: opting
...o students. For example, they encourage to opt for fields that are more beneficial to ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or prohibit them to take certain fields . Concluding, encouraging students to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... prohibit them to take certain fields . Concluding, encouraging students to p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, in short, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91370558376 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78268503497 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421319796954 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0037820718 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6666666667 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420112954949 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128060762936 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150025777739 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246111057167 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667064219877 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.