As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author's claim about the deterioration of human thinking capacities as human relies more on the technology is quiet debatable. Today, due to the advancement of technology in almost in all the fields, is making humans lazy, dependent on the technologies to do their work. This is certainly making a man lessen his thinking capacities and narrow this visualization abilities. In other words, humans are being enthralled by the machine and technologies. There are several examples to debate on this claim and potential examples to prove that the technology is deteriorating the human thinking ability.
Let us consider an example, compare the calculating ability of today's generation and our previous generations. In the previous generations there were no calculators and all the math calculations was being done using fingers, numerical figures and minds. But today, we certainly have calculators in every hand which makes the calculations far more easier, quicker and accurate. However, the use of calculator is making everyone not to use their minds to calculate and rather use the calculator even for simple multiplication and division operations. This is making human thinking ability deteriorate. Once we are addicted to such usage, the mind will not relapse to older habit of mental calculations, which will indirectly diminishes the thinking ability.
One more example to connote is the advancement of the mobile technology. The mobile technology has evolved in such a way that the usage of letters have become extinct. Few decades back, contacting to our kith and kin was possible only by writing letters. But the advancement of these mobile technology have made such contacts so easier that writing letters to anyone is becoming extinct. Here one thing we have to observe that the advancement of mobile technology is discouraging the writing skills of the people, and with dictionary features incorporated in messaging application will hinder the English learning capacities of a person. This is acceptable since the technology is making the man to become addicted to the technology and hinder his or her learning ability.
Although, it is said that the advancement of technology is making human lazy and lessen his or her thinking ability, the advancement of such technology has also brought so many things easy in our daily life. For example in the field of medicine, the advanced x-ray scanning machines will capture even the hair line fractures in any part of the body. The MRI scanning reports will detect critical insidious diseases. This will help the doctors to identify the diseases and provide the patients with proper medicines.
Thus, in total, though the human relay on the advanced technology is helping in one way, the dangers such as loosing the thinking capacities and wider visualizations are lurking which seem insidious.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...y hand which makes the calculations far more easier, quicker and accurate. However, the use...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...helping in one way, the dangers such as loosing the thinking capacities and wider visualiza...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2408.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29230769231 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92503941392 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496703296703 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7642497452 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.454545455 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6818181818 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180373666028 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059372102252 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480337527019 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103428981718 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240810144099 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.