It is obvious that doing projects in a group will be beneficial for people instead of carrying on them alone. In other words, working in a team has a lot of advantages over working alone. Therefore, I strongly believe that a group project can satisfy common goals of a team when all members of a team collaborate with each other, and people who insist on doing things based on their desires cannot help the team to meet its objectives. In the following paragraphs I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
I think when members of a group should act according to the opinions of the majority of group. In other words, in a teamwork activity it is important for members to consult each other about different subjects and do the best thing which helps the whole of team to meet its aims. For example, I took part in a research group in university in which there is a person who did not pay attention to other’s opinions and insisted in doing work that he proposed. As a result, we agreed with his opinion and followed his instructions; thus, finally we could not get good result, while if we acted based on the idea that other members advise to do, we could be fulfill our goals.
Moreover, I believed that people who always insist that group should act according to their opinion are selfish people and cannot be successful in teamwork skills. They do not share their information with others in a group and they think that they are better than others. They do not respect other’s attitudes and cause other members to be annoyed. Consequently, these individuals not only emotionally damage other people but also cannot help the group achieve its goals. For instance, I experienced a group project in which my friend preferred to perform tasks on basis of her idea and did not listen to others and argued others because he thought that he has more information about subject than others. Hence, he led others to be upset with him and he was forced to leave the group.
To sum up, in my point of view, in a teamwork activity people who are able to communicate with other members of a team and cooperate with others can better help the team meet its goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...d on the idea that other members advise to do, we could be fulfill our goals. Moreo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an better help the team meet its goals.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60411311054 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50784614742 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46529562982 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8310182053 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.45110844103 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406133400663 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143215285994 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506405039732 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246135098144 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789166829992 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.