In any nation, it is a crucial role of the society to prepare it's individuals for gaining a sense of leadership in any field- be it politics or industry. However, the tutors of any society can choose two possible ways for accomplishing this goal- it can either be achieved through co-operation or competition.
When an individual takes birth, it is his/her natural instinct of competing with his adjoining premise which helps in his survival.
Darwin had once quoted while stating the principal of natural selection- "The fittest survive." Thus, competition is an innate quality possessed by every individual. Any human being would therefore first think about the self before thinking about people. Nevertheless, if a person fails to co-operate with the world in his process of development, he/she most likely succumbs to failure.
A striking example which can be provided is of a teacher-student relationship. When a child starts schooling, the innate sense of competition would provide him/her an edge over other students. Nonetheless, if the child is excessively focused on achieving his/her goals and fails to respect the teacher, then most likely he/she would end up getting various punishments throughout academic years. Also, an excess of competition breeds selfishness. A selfish pupil will misbehave in school and end up scoring less in exams. As a consequence, he/she would have less friends.
Moreover, co-operation is indeed a key to a person's development. If an actress wants to make a good career in the film industry, then she should have an amiable personality. If she is more friendly with the casting couch, she will get more acting projects. On the contrary, an obstinate behavior and a sense of opportunism may end up in her replacement in a project. But, a friendly nature will help her to gain accolade by the public and the media.
In a nutshell, although competition helps in the growth of a person, it is attributable to the individual's co-operative nature which will lead to his professional development. Various great personalities like Sachin Tendulkar, Kit Harrington, Isaac Newton were competitive. However, despite of this nature they equally possessed a sense of co-operation towards their fellow supporters. Thus, conclusively, the best way for a society to prepare it's young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of co-operation not competition, as it is an innate quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In any nation, it is a crucial role of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... through co-operation or competition. When an individual takes birth, it is hi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... premise which helps in his survival. Darwin had once quoted while stating the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.../she most likely succumbs to failure. A striking example which can be pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun friends is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ms. As a consequence, he/she would have less friends. Moreover, co-...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uence, he/she would have less friends. Moreover, co-operation is indeed a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...over, co-operation is indeed a key to a persons development. If an actress wants to mak...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accolade by the public and the media. In a nutshell, although competiti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17728954619 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563131313131 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.473778417 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5238095238 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0371270124932 0.243740707755 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.011093134013 0.0831039109588 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235744504161 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0188854886506 0.150359130593 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198598850538 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.