Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Throughout our life, we come across countless people that some of them are temporary and after a while, disappear for good; in contrast, some of them are permanently and life with us for a long time. Each group can affect us adversely or favorably and create numerous changes in our life. Teachers are from the former group and can change our personality considerably. For this reason, whether or not teacher can talk about their political or social views in the classroom is questionable. Although some people agree with this outlook, I personally do not. I substantiate my reasons in the following paragraphs to elucidate my reasons.
First and foremost, decreasing the responsibility of students is one the adverse effect of knowing political and social views of teachers. Students give respects it their teachers and think that they are perfect persons. Under these circumstances, students become biased on their teachers' views and do not criticize other beliefs to choose the best one. In addition, this occurrence results in reducing the deciding ability of such students. My own experience is a compelling example. When I was at high school, my history teacher revealed her political issue about the election of president to us. I loved this teacher that was a hero for me. I considered her attitude an ideal one and do not search enough about this important issue. Consequently, I supported the candidate that finally, I realized his negative aspects and blamed myself. Indeed, teachers should not put students in a specific direction by indicating their social and political views.
Moreover, talking about their political and social views, teachers make conflicts in the classroom. Students in front of their teachers' view feel superiority over students against their teachers' view. Not only does this occurrence make a lot of mental problems for students and adversely affect their studying, but also it wastes a huge amount of time that should be allotted to teaching the course. Neither students nor teacher benefit from this. To illustrate, consider again the president election in my country. Last year, my sister's teachers spent a lot of time and energy of the class to this concept. They missed their useful time for teaching students effectively and preparing them for final exams. As a result, my sister and her friends act awfully in their exams that resulted in reducing the efficiency and rank of the high school. Subsequently, not only did the wage of teachers reduce, but also my sister missed her chance for entering the Olympiad. In short, nobody can deny making conflicts and wasting time owing to proposing social and political concepts in the classroom by teachers.
In conclusion, it is true that social and political views are important part in our life; but it is not a good idea that teachers speak about these issues in the classroom on account of its demerits including reducing the responsibility of students in their decisions and making conflicts and wasting time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...sonality considerably. For this reason, whether or not teacher can talk about their political ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in short, talking about, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11382113821 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75537799082 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502032520325 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9631790331 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1851851852 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96296296296 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355670375795 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998984973626 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931272910787 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226128752233 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437049844998 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.