Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History plays crucial roles in any society and receives great attention in recent years. In this environment, although some people think that it is important for all university students to take history courses on account of its merits including gaining precious knowledge and experience through it, I totally disagree with this outlook. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my attitude.
First and foremost, different students have different interest which based on their willing, they choose their majors. It is crystal clear that taking history courses is boring and difficult for a lot of students who their field of study is not history or associated with them. Under these circumstances, students become frustrated and hate to learn about history which adversely affect the country. This is because they neither read history books nor watch history movies in their free time and become completely unfamiliar with their country's history. To illustrate, consider my own experience as a compelling example. I liked to read stories about world wars before entering university and through which, I increased my general information incredibly. Unfortunately, I had to take a history course in the university which was tedious, and I got a bad grade in it. After that time, I disguised history and gave up my previous habit. This example demonstrates the catastrophic consequences of taking history courses by all students.
Moreover, when all students take history courses, the competition for getting a job in this field becomes very hard which is not fair for students whose major is history. There are numerous job positions which ignore the major of applicants and concentrate only on their knowledge and some specific courses. It goes without saying that should all students take history courses, there will be a lot of qualified applicants for such positions and will decrease the chance of history students to get the job. A recent research conducted in my country verified this claim. More than 50 percent of employees in associated works with history were not history students. Consequently, in a long term, there are less students that choose history as their major which reduces expertise in this important field of study.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned details and examples, I think that taking history courses for all university students is not a good idea. This is because not only is history boring and difficult for students whose major is not correlated to history, but also this policy decreases the chance of being employed for history students, and the less chance of success, the less professionals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...Consequently, in a long term, there are less students that choose history as their m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 811, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtise in this important field of study. In conclusion, based on the aforemention...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun professionals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ts, and the less chance of success, the less professionals.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, moreover, so, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26291079812 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80570152202 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50234741784 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1508231357 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269357278583 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897519442862 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618752682298 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17491288025 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325578060101 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.