The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To a certain extent I agree that reducing the commuting demand might improve traffic congestions in some big cities. However, I also believe that the government can use other solutions to solve this problem.
On the one hand, decreasing the travelling need will bring some benefits. Firstly, it might help to reduce the number of transports moves on roads. This means it is easy to travel and traffic jams rarely appear. The roads will become larger, which makes the number of accidents fall down. Moreover, if people can live and work in a same building, they save a lot of time and the cost for travelling. Beside that, the air and noise pollution will be enhanced by cutting the number of transportations used.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that reducing the moving demand is not the only way. Beside that, there are some possible solutions. Firstly, the government should invest in building bridges and roads to develop traffic. When infrastructure are advanced, the problems related to traffic will be tackled. Secondly, scientists should focus on researching and developing some new means of transportation, which enables everyone to travel for work, education, shopping to anywhere they want easily and conveniently. Also, the inventions in the field can help to save fuel and protect environment. Moreover, the government must always educate citizens, especially children so that they have responsibility and awareness of taking part in traffic. The government should encourage everyone to use public transports, bicycles to replace for motorbikes and cars, following traffic rules.
For the aforementioned reasons, I personally think that reducing the need for travelling of people is a possible solution, but it is not the only one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other solutions to solve this problem. On the one hand, decreasing the travelli...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the number of transportations used. On the other hand, I strongly believe th...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kes and cars, following traffic rules. For the aforementioned reasons, I person...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2846975089 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90102169071 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4751751178 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3529411765 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248482496333 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071020856986 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765245549603 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173035697924 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805543809991 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.