Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that nowadays, job plays a key role in our lives, and nobody can deny the influence of the job’s duration in our daily life (avoid repetition). A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is that doing a job with extended hours but in fewer days in a week provides more benefits than a job with more days but shorter hours. Some people may hold this viewpoint that having a job only three days a week with longer hours is much better whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. From my own perspective, the first belief is more beneficial; in what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to my mind at first is that by working only three days a week, people allocate more time to travel with their family or friends. meaning that more fun free time is available. Since people want to go to another city or a place far from their hometown, they need more time to do this. For example, my uncle working three days a week, so every two weeks he and his family to go on a vacation and visit a new small city surrounding their hometown. Although he tolerates the long hours during those three days, he enjoys the weekend more than people going to work every day. As you can see, if people do a job three days a week with longer hours, they will have enough time to go to travel with their family and friends.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that by completing a job in fewer days, people have less stress during the rest of the week. This is a fact that thinking of doing a task every day and putting energy to complete, leads to us doing it as soon as possible causing a great deal of pressure and tension until they are finished. For instance, my professor usually assigned some projects and defined two or three days for doing them. He put all his effort and got help from students in order to complete it ASAP. when it has done, the professor and students feel happy and waking up in the morning without any stress. They also planned to go to travel and accumulate their energy to start a new week. This experience thought me that the more hours people do their work, the more free days and vacations they have.
To wrap it up, though some may oppose this idea, doing a job during a few days a week in longer hours would be more beneficial for people. Not only will people have more free time to go travel with their friends, but also they feel less stress and tension during the rest of the week. All in all, it is suggested that people decide more narrowly that which type of those jobs are convenient for them to have a better life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meaning
...to travel with their family or friends. meaning that more fun free time is available. S...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 524, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... students in order to complete it ASAP. when it has done, the professor and students...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, whereas, for example, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43584521385 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21845461817 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470468431772 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8495376458 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375366788554 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120019149833 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858253407401 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251399086162 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037403737362 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.