Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Politics and social views are one of the most controversial issues in our modern-day society. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that teachers should not discuss their political or social convictions at their workplace. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, arguing about ideological beliefs could be a waste of time and a major distraction for learners. Most parents spend large sums of money on their children's education and educators should take this into account and ensure that students fully understand their classes. Hence, talking about irrelevant subjects in the classroom could affect the attendees' attention. For instance, some students might get preoccupied with thoughts about what the teacher said or mentioned leaving them with very little concentration to focus on their curriculums. My own experience is a compelling example on what I mean. When I was in high school, our biology teacher was interested in political debates and spending half of the assigned class time defending stances on government decisions was a usual thing. Unfortunately, our grades on the final examinations suffered since we did not benefit from the alloted tutoring time.
Secondly, having such discussions at school could have a negative impact on the teachers' careers and their relation with their students. Everyday, more and more organizations realize the bad outcomes that could come about from their staff or members bringing their beliefs to public places, especially in a community of diverse cultures. Thus, companies and educational institutions are changing their codes of conduct to prohibit such problematic behaviors. As a result, a teacher who chooses to engage in that kind of contentious conversations might risk breaking the law and therefore compromising the future of her or his career. Moreover, a hit to the mentor's relationship with learners is unavoidable under heated exchanges.
To sum up, I am of the position that it's better for teachers to be careful and never initiate a political or social chats while on the clock. This is mainly due to the fact that this could consume the students' time and also might jeopardize the tutor's employment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'attendees'' or 'attendee's'?
Suggestion: attendees'; attendee's
...jects in the classroom could affect the attendees attention. For instance, some students ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
...and their relation with their students. Everyday, more and more organizations realize th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 658, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mentors'' or 'mentor's'?
Suggestion: mentors'; mentor's
...r or his career. Moreover, a hit to the mentors relationship with learners is unavoidab...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is unavoidable under heated exchanges. To sum up, I am of the position that its...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...ents time and also might jeopardize the tutors employment.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, i mean, kind of, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89722258999 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613445378151 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6299491795 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 5.45110844103 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226819172621 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661697291483 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667331695246 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141711144866 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710439835899 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.