Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that in today's progressing world, the government should devote their annually budget to develop different aspect and facilities of society. There is an argument between people that if the government should spend more budget for improving internet access than public transportation or not. In my point of view, it is more significant for every government that devote more money to the improvement of internet access.
To begin with, in recent years, most of the countries’ office systems are connected to the world internet and approximately their whole work is doing by use of internet. For instance, all of the banks uses from internet for money exchanging etc. Moreover, by development of internet, digital marketing have been expanded in the whole world. So a very big part of every country's economic is dependent on a fast and reliable internet network. Therefore, every government should give a huge attention to the internet network.
Furthermore, in these days many peoples use the internet to do their daily life's work. Therefore, a good internet network can bring safety and comfort for them and they do not need to go out from their house and job place to doing some of their works. For example, students’ uses from the internet to access some search engines and libraries such as "Scopus" and "Google" for their researches. Additionally, many peoples employ the internet network to pay their bills or buy tickets. Therefore, a good internet access will help them to do their work easier and faster.
To sum up, because whole the government's economic and office system's are dependent on the internet and people uses from it in their daily life, the government should spent more fund to improvement of internet network that other things such as public transportation. In future, it seems that every people will be more dependent on internet for spending their life, therefore, the internet need more attention by every government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...doing by use of internet. For instance, all of the banks uses from internet for money exch...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ster. To sum up, because whole the governments economic and office systems are depende...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 267, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...r things such as public transportation. In future, it seems that every people will be mor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2298136646 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97206266994 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496894409938 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3953260619 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.266666667 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275513439535 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112652189522 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084135136907 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195721584314 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063169240352 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.